In the 20th century if leaders had spent money on civilian endevours instead of going to or preparing to go to wars, what could have been achieved?
In the 20th century if leaders had spent money on civilian endevours instead of going to or preparing to go to wars, what could have been achieved?
Share
Related Questions
- If Soviet tanks were as good or better than German tanks, why were so many more Soviet soldiers killed in ...
- Could tethered blimps have thwarted the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor?
- Why was Hitler attacking the Soviet Union a big mistake?
- What are some examples of Canadian propaganda used during World War 2?
- Would it be correct to rename the Volyn massacre, the Polish-Ukrainian massacre? There were bilateral ethnic cleansings with thousands of ...
- Should the British defenders of Singapore have turned guerilla rather than surrendering to the Japanese?
- Why didn't the British hide troops on the Malay peninsula and then attack the Japanese from the rear as they ...
- What was it like to work for the Red Cross in Nazi-occupied Europe during World War II?
- What role did the Soviet fleet play in WWII?
- In WWII, did the Germans keep the Soviet kolkhozes and state factories during their occupation of Ukraine and Western Russia?